By Joe Palca
Editing DNA has never been easier. Pasieka/Science Photo Library/Corbis hide caption
toggle caption Pasieka/Science Photo Library/Corbis
Every once in a while a technology comes along that completely alters the way scientists do their work.
It’s hard to imagine astronomy without a telescope or high energy physics without an accelerator.
From here on in, it’s going to be impossible to imagine biology without CRISPR-Cas9.
Simply put, CRISPR-Cas9 allows scientists to make specific changes to specific genes in living cells. Such a thing was possible in the past using technques called zinc finger nucleases and Talens. But those techniques were cumbersome and weren’t widely adopted.
In the three short years since the first scientific papers appeared about CRISPR-Cas9, the technique has been “spreading like wildfire,” says Ramesh Akkina, a molecular immunologist at Colorado State University.
And for 2015, the journal Science called CRISPR the “breakthrough of the year.”
There’ve been lots of ethical debates about what the new gene editing technique could do, such as creating designer babies or making mutant species.
But most biologists aren’t interested in making designer babies or mutant species. They just want to understand basic things like how the cells in our bodies work, or how certain genes function. They expect CRISPR-Cas 9 to be very, very helpful with those lines of inquiry.
Recently I visited Colorado State University to give a talk, but I realized it would be a great place to assess just how far and wide CRISPR-Cas9 had spread.
First, I talked with Christopher Allen, a scientist in the environmental and radiological health sciences department who studies the genes that are important for repairing DNA inside our cells.
When that repair process goes wrong, the result can be cancer. So Allen would like to be able to compare cells side by side: one that has a gene he thinks is important in the repair process, and one that is missing that gene. To do that, he has to modify the genome of a cell, something CRISPR-Cas9 will let him do easily.
Another scientist named Carol Wilusz studies how and when genes are expressed in stem cells. She says CRISPR-Cas9 is going to make a difference in her work, “because it’s going to enable us to enable us to do experiments that we’ve been struggling to do through other approaches.”
Now Wilusz and Allen aren’t trying to cure diseases, at least not directly, but CRISPR might be useful for that, too.
“The work we’re doing now is to use CRISPR-Cas technology to delete HIV genome from infected cells, such that the cell can be cured completely, says Ramesh Akkina, a virologist at Colorado State University. Right now he’s perfecting that trick in cells in the lab, but he’s working on a scheme to do it in patients as well.
CRISPR-Cas9 isn’t just useful for working organisms in the animal kingdom. It’s useful in forests and fields.
“I study diseases of plants,” says plant geneticist Jan Leach, “and my goal is to try to make plants that are resistant to different pathogens,”
She says there are a host of genes inside plant cells that turn on when the plant tries to fight invasion from bacteria or fungi. She’d like to be able modify all of them. With CRISPR-Cas9, she can.
“I’ve been working in this particular area for over 20 years, and in 20 years I’ve been able to do one or two genes,” says Allen. “With CRISPR-Cas I’ll be able to do 20 or 30.”
In two days, I spoke with 9 different researchers. I asked them all the same question. “Will CRISPR-CAS9 have an impact on your work?”
Honestly, it’s stunning to witness the impact CRISPR Cas9 has had on biology. It ranks with the most important tools invented in the last century. I wouldn’t be surprised if it wins Science magazine’s breakthrough of the year next year too.
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.