The NFL is suspending Oakland Raiders linebacker Vontaze Burfict without pay for the rest of the 2019 season, after Burfict lowered his head to make helmet-to-helmet contact during a tackle this weekend.

“The discipline marks the longest punishment ever handed down for an on-field act in NFL history,” NFL.com says in regard to Burfict, who has repeatedly violated the league’s unnecessary roughness rules.

Burfict was ejected Sunday after his hit on Indianapolis Colts tight end Jack Doyle, who had just caught a pass in the middle of the field and was partly on the ground when the linebacker lowered the crown of his helmet and plowed into Doyle’s head. A suspension seemed certain — but on Monday, the NFL said it has seen enough of Burfict this year.

“There were no mitigating circumstances on this play,” Jon Runyan, NFL vice president of football operations, said in a letter to Burfict. “Your contact was unnecessary, flagrant and should have been avoided.”

Runyan — who had a 14-year NFL career as an offensive tackle before moving into politics and then back to the NFL — noted that he and other officials have repeatedly warned Burfict that he would face increasingly stiff punishments if he continued to break the game’s rules.

“However, you have continued to flagrantly abuse rules designated to protect yourself and your opponents from unnecessary risk,” Runyan said in his letter.

Under the league’s labor agreement, players have the right to appeal a suspension within three days; Burfict plans to appeal the punishment, according to NFL.com. The league’s site also notes that Burfict has been either suspended or fined 13 times over the course of his more than seven pro seasons.

This is Burfict’s first season with the Oakland Raiders, having signed a one-year contract to join the team after seven tumultuous years with the Cincinnati Bengals.

Burfict was at the center of an infamous incident in 2016, when he launched himself into the head of then-Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown — a vicious hit that helped to end the Bengals’ playoff run, in a wildcard game they had been close to winning.

Brown, who is now without an NFL team after accusations of sexual assault, was briefly Burfict’s teammate in Oakland this year.

Burfict’s penchant for breaking his sport’s rules dates back to his college career at Arizona State University: He once collected three personal fouls in just one half of a football game.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Updated at 12:17 p.m. ET

In a move that puts California on a collision course with the NCAA, Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed a bill effectively allowing college athletes in the state to earn compensation for the use of their likeness, sign endorsement deals and hire agents to represent them.

The governor signed the measure in a segment released Monday by Uninterrupted, a sports programming company co-founded by LeBron James.

Newsom proclaimed the move as “the beginning of a national movement — one that transcends geographic and partisan lines.”

“Collegiate student athletes put everything on the line — their physical health, future career prospects and years of their lives to compete. Colleges reap billions from these student athletes’ sacrifices and success but, in the same breath, block them from earning a single dollar,” he said in a statement. “That’s a bankrupt model — one that puts institutions ahead of the students they are supposed to serve. It needs to be disrupted.”

California is the first state to pass such a law, which is to take effect on Jan. 1, 2023.

That marks a significant shift from the current policies enforced by the NCAA, collegiate sports’ national governing body, which generally renders student-athletes ineligible to accept compensation for “the use of his or her name or picture to advertise, recommend or promote directly the sale or use of a commercial product or service of any kind.”

And the NCAA Board of Governors pushed back hard against the bill at the time of its passage in the Legislature, saying that it would leave the playing field for universities of different sizes radically uneven.

“Right now, nearly half a million student-athletes in all 50 states compete under the same rules,” the 22-member panel composed mostly of university presidents and athletic directors said in a letter to Newsom on Sept. 11. “This bill would remove that essential element of fairness and equal treatment that forms the bedrock of college sports.”

On Monday, shortly after Newsom’s announcement, the NCAA released another, slightly more conciliatory statement — one acknowledging that “changes are needed to continue to support student-athletes” but also warning that “this new law already is creating confusion for current and future student-athletes, coaches, administrators and campuses, and not just in California.”

“We will consider next steps in California,” the group added, “while our members move forward with ongoing efforts to make adjustments to NCAA name, image and likeness rules that are both realistic in modern society and tied to higher education.”

The financial stakes of the dispute are massive.

Between TV rights, marketing fees and other avenues — particularly for its major cash cow, the NCAA Division I men’s basketball tournament — the organization has reported annual revenues cresting $1 billion.

The NCAA maintains that it converts much of that intake into crucial opportunities for student-athletes, saying it has “provided billions of dollars in scholarships and the opportunity for millions across 24 sports to earn undergraduate and graduate degrees.”

That hasn’t silenced critics, who have grown louder in recent years amid a recent spate of high-profile investigations — including efforts by the FBI — looking into alleged corrupt recruiting practices in NCAA men’s basketball. The hefty punishments levied against schools and players by the national governing body has focused a spotlight on why the competitors featured in such a lucrative industry are left out of its profits.

Michael Sokolove, who wrote of the massive scandal at the University of Louisville’s basketball program in The Last Temptation Of Rick Pitino, talked to Fresh Air last year about one notable discrepancy.

“If you look at a program like Louisville, which is a program that I focused on, they generate about $45 million a year in revenue. They give out 13 scholarships. That adds up to about $400,000 a year. The rest of it gets spread out to the coach, who makes $8 million a year, to the assistant coaches, who make as much as a half-million dollars a year,” Sokolove said.

“All throughout the athletic department, people are making six-figure salaries. It does not go to the players, what I call the unpaid workforce.”

Pushback also has come from a number of prominent athletes, including James, who opted to skip college basketball entirely to head straight to the NBA — before the pro league implemented a minimum age requirement in 2006, barring others from following James’ path.

“Part of the reason I went to the NBA is to get my mom out of the situation that she was in,” James said in the informal signing ceremony with Newsom that was held on a barbershop set. “I couldn’t have done that if I would have stepped on a college campus.”

Others, such as NFL cornerback Richard Sherman, have rejected the notion put forward by the NCAA and others that a free college education is recompense enough for the amount of work these athletes put in. Sherman told Sports Illustrated in 2015 that he would “love for a regular student to have a student-athlete’s schedule during the season for just one quarter or one semester and show me how you balance that.”

“People think, ‘Oh, you’re on scholarship.’ They pay for your room and board, they pay for your education, but to their knowledge, you’re there to play football,” said Sherman, who got his degree from Stanford University. “You’re not on scholarship for school and it sounds crazy when a student-athlete says that, but those are the things coaches tell them every day: ‘You’re not on scholarship for school.’ “

Let’s block ads! (Why?)