Republican Blake Farenthold On Changing His Position On GOP Health Care Bill

David Greene speaks with Republican Rep. Blake Farenthold of Texas. He originally didn’t like the GOP health care bill, but has changed his position after meeting with the president.

DAVID GREENE, HOST:

And the other big story we are covering this morning – a moment of truth for President Trump and his party. Republicans have talked about repealing the Affordable Care Act for a long time and today comes a vote in the House on a possible replacement but it is not clear if the party will have the votes it needs. President Trump has made last minute appeals to some GOP lawmakers to come around. One member who has and plans to vote for the bill despite earlier reservations is conservative Congressman Blake Farenthold, a Republican from Texas. And I asked the Congressman, what changed his mind?

BLAKE FARENTHOLD: Well, I’ve – still don’t believe it’s the perfect solution, but one of the things I’ve learned in Congress is the perfect is the enemy of the doable. And this looks like the vehicle to repeal Obamacare, which is something I promised to do when I first ran in 2010, and looks like we’re finally going to get around to it.

GREENE: Well, if it’s not perfect, but it’s gotten to a place where you can support it, was there something critical that happened that brought you there?

FARENTHOLD: Well, the president called about a dozen of us over to the White House, and he personally asked me to vote for it. They added some provisions that give more control to the states with respect to block grants and giving the states the authority to add a work requirement for able-bodied adults with no children. And, you know, we’re just moving it towards a more conservative solution. The problem still remains, though, that there’s a lot still to be done in these other pieces of legislation that are going to require 60 votes in the Senate. And the president said he was going to really help turn up the heat on those senators to get the 60 votes when we need them.

GREENE: But I hear you saying that he turned up the heat on you, and it worked.

FARENTHOLD: Listen, I was – I’m committed to repealing Obamacare. And the only vehicle that’s going to get us there is a vehicle that the president supports and is going to sign. You know, again, nothing’s perfect, but the fact that the president told me he was behind it 100 percent – actually he said 1,000 percent – and was going to be an advocate for making it better, that’s what it took for me. I’m taking Donald Trump at his word.

GREENE: I understand it this week he told many Republicans that they risked losing their seats if they didn’t get behind this bill. Did he say that to you?

FARENTHOLD: He said it in the House Republican Conference, and I think that’s true. Every single one of us ran on repealing Obamacare, and this is the bill that’s going to move forward to repeal Obamacare. I would hate to go back home and have my constituents tell me, Blake, you had the opportunity to get rid of Obamacare, and you didn’t do it. Why are you still in Washington?

GREENE: I mean, if I may, that sounds like putting politics, in a way, ahead of substance. I mean, if you don’t think the bill is perfect, why not spend some more time getting to a place where you feel good about a bill? This is making it sound like, you know what? I got to get rid of Obamacare. Maybe the law is not something I like, but I got to do it to make sure I keep my seat.

FARENTHOLD: Well, it’s about keeping promises. The situation we’re in right now is – my conservative friends and the folks in the tea party say the bill doesn’t go far enough. And the more moderates, whether they’re liberals back in the District or whether they’re more moderate Republicans here in Washington, are saying the bill goes too far. So we really are very close to the sweet spot on this, and it’s going to take some pressure from President Trump to move anything forward.

GREENE: I want to ask you about one of the specific changes that you and some of your colleagues were pleased about and helped you come around. Under the previous law, if you were getting a tax credit that was actually more than the premium you were paying, you got to keep that money and maybe put it in a health savings account. You wanted to get rid of that provision because you were worried that some people might use some of those tax credit dollars for abortions. Is that right?

FARENTHOLD: Well, there’s a provision in there that was added that says you cannot use those excess dollars for an abortion. That’s long-standing Republican policy. But the idea is you need to have more options available, and we’re increasing the health savings account, but we don’t want to do it at a point that breaks the bank.

GREENE: But if I may, as I understand, I mean, there would be relatively few people who would actually get a tax credit that was more than their premium and even far fewer people who would actually decide to use that money for an abortion. So we’re talking about very few Americans here. Is that fair?

FARENTHOLD: I think the issue is whether – for those of us who are extremely pro-life, like I am, just saving one unborn baby is a big deal.

GREENE: So I’m hearing you say that a big part of this is not just making health care better for Americans, but you needed to be able to sleep at night and feel like you were supporting a law that remained true to your conservative values on issues like abortion.

FARENTHOLD: That’s 100 percent correct. And again, as I say, this bill is not perfect. President Trump has said he’s going to continue to work to make it better. We’re treading on thin ice here in the House because we don’t want to send something over to the Senate that is going to go afoul of the Byrd rule and not be able to pass with 51 votes. So we’re giving them a framework, and we’re counting on the president and the senators to make it even better.

GREENE: You mentioned how there are people in your party who are more conservative, who are more moderate, kind of on both sides who have some real concerns about this replacement bill. Are you talking to them? Are you going to them and saying, you know, we really should come around here? And if so, what are you telling them?

FARENTHOLD: My message to my colleagues, whether they’re to the left of me or to the right of me, is you ran on repealing Obamacare. If you can show me a path that’s going to get us there other than this, I want to hear it. And none of them have been able to come up with a path to getting rid of it other than this bill that the president says he’s 1,000 percent behind and that’s going to come up for vote.

GREENE: All right, Congressman, thanks so much for taking the time. We really appreciate it.

FARENTHOLD: Thank you very much.

GREENE: Blake Farenthold is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

For Gideon, Infection With a Common Virus Caused Rare Birth Defects

Gideon, 3, communicates with his parents Kathleen Muldoon and Seth Dobson, his sister Genevieve and brother Cormac, using an electronic device they call, “Gideon’s talker.”

Caitlin O’Hara for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

Caitlin O’Hara for NPR

When Kathleen Muldoon had her second child everything was going smoothly. The delivery was short, the baby’s APGAR score was good and he was a healthy weight.

“Everyone said he was amazing,” says Muldoon.

But when a doctor noticed that Gideon was jaundiced, everything changed. Nurses put him under a fluorescent light to treat the problem. But it didn’t work. Instead, he developed a red rash all over his body. Blood work indicated newborn Gideon was infected with a virus Muldoon had never heard of: Cytomegalovirus or CMV – a virus that can cause severe birth defects.

Muldoon, 40 of Peoria, Ariz., remembers the pediatrician coming in to deliver the bad news.

“He couldn’t even make eye contact,” she says.

Gideon was diagnosed with extensive brain damage, spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, visual impairment, epilepsy and microcephaly – that’s the neurological condition also caused by the Zika virus, where the baby’s head is abnormally small. Gideon spent the first four weeks of his life in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Kathleen helps her son Gideon get his glasses on. Part of Gideon’s brain was damaged during development, which effects his vision.

Caitlin O’Hara for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

Caitlin O’Hara for NPR

Gideon’s case is unusually severe. Every year about 40,000 babies are born in the U.S. infected with CMV. Most won’t have any symptoms. But one in five will have CMV-related problems, like hearing loss, cognitive delay or neurological problems like Gideon.

Cytomegalovirus Is Everywhere

Like cold and flu viruses, CMV is transmitted from person to person. It travels in bodily fluids like blood, urine and saliva. It is extremely common, according to Dr. Joseph Bocchini, a pediatric infectious disease specialist with Louisiana State University.

“Cytomegalovirus is everywhere,” he says. It is hard to avoid.

By middle age, more than half of adults are infected. By age 5, nearly 1 in 3 children have it. They pick it up from kissing or touching someone or something, like a door handle, table or toy that’s been contaminated. The virus can live on these objects for hours. Once you’ve been infected with CMV, the virus stays with you for life.

Kathleen helps Gideon into his chair while his sister Genevieve plays with her dolls, one of whom has a wheelchair.

Caitlin O’Hara for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

Caitlin O’Hara for NPR

For most people, CMV isn’t a problem. It rarely causes symptoms and if it does they’re pretty mild, similar to a cold, says Dr.Brenna Hughes, an associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Duke University School of Medicine. CMV usually just causes sniffles and possibly a low grade fever, she says.

However, CMV infection can cause serious health problems for people with weakened immune systems, such as individuals with HIV or those who have an organ transplant. And it can be a big problem for pregnant women.

Timing Can Make All The Difference

CMV can pass through the placenta to the fetus, but that doesn’t happen very often. If a woman was infected with CMV before getting pregnant, there’s a less than 1 percent chance she’ll pass the infection on to her fetus. And even if the baby is infected with CMV, the majority don’t have any symptoms. But timing can make all the difference, says Hughes.

If a woman gets infected for the very first time when she’s pregnant, the virus is more dangerous “probably because there’s more virus and less of an immune response already present in the mother,” says infectious disease specialist Bocchini. About 10 percent of these babies will likely have CMV-related problems and about 3 percent of them will be severely affected like Gideon.

Muldoon helps Gideon stretch as he wakes up at their home in Peoria, Ariz.

Caitlin O’Hara for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

Caitlin O’Hara for NPR

The stage of pregnancy when first infected also makes a difference. If the mother’s in her first trimester, when organs like the brain are developing, the consequences can be devastating. Doctors told Muldoon she was likely infected during her first trimester.

Today, Gideon is 3 years old. He uses a wheelchair, can’t see well or speak, but he loves sounds and music. He giggles loudly when he hears his mother sing. But Muldoon is worried that even his precious hearing may be in jeopardy. CMV can cause hearing loss three to five years after the initial infection, and Gideon is starting to show some hearing loss in his left ear.

‘I Had Never Heard Of This Virus’

When Muldoon reflects on her pregnancy, she is astonished that she didn’t know anything about CMV before she had Gideon, especially since she’s an anthropologist who teaches anatomy to medical students at Arizona’s Midwestern University.

“And yet I had never heard of this virus,” she says.

Muldoon works as an associate professor at Midwestern University, where she teaches anatomy. She had never been told about CMV.

Caitlin O’Hara for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

Caitlin O’Hara for NPR

Muldoon’s not alone. A survey from the National CMV Foundation found only 9 percent of women knew about the virus and a study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found fewer than half of OB-GYNs discuss CMV with their patients.

Hughes, who is also a spokesperson for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG,) says pregnant women are generally told the best way to avoid infection is “careful hand washing,” and to avoid interacting with sick people.

Until 2015 ACOG recommended more aggressive prevention efforts, especially for women who are around toddlers, who can be hot zones for viral transmission with all their dribbling and drooling. They recommended pregnant women wash their hands every single time after they handle a child’s toy or laundry and not to kiss a child on the face where contaminated saliva might be present. These suggestions were scrapped when no conclusive evidence was found that they actually prevent infection, says Hughes.

There’s currently a debate in the medical community about whether to screen all newborns for CMV. Many doctors are skeptical, since there is no proven treatment. One study suggests antiviral medication in the first six months of life might decrease the risk of later hearing loss and cognitive decline.

“This is a challenging virus,” says Dr. Mobeen Rathore, an infectious disease specialist with the University of Florida. “We need better diagnostic tools, better treatments and better ways to manage infection,” he says.

Obstetrician Hughes agrees, and says further research and larger studies are needed. She notes that Congress approved $1 billion to support Zika virus research and prevention, but CMV does not have a line item for funding in the annual budget — this, despite the fact that CMV is far more common in the U.S. than Zika.


Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Analyzing Obamacare's Impact In Arizona

With the collapse of the Republicans’ health care bill, we consider the impact on Arizona, a state where many have benefited from Obamacare, but others have been hard hit by rising insurance premiums.

LOURDES GARCIA-NAVARRO, HOST:

It was a tumultuous week in Washington with President Trump and House Republicans unable to agree on a repeal of the Affordable Care Act. So Obamacare remains, as Speaker Paul Ryan said, the law of the land. So how is that law playing out for people? Critics often point to Arizona as a state where the Affordable Care Act has not worked out well. Reporter Will Stone joins us from member station KJZZ in Tempe to talk about the ACA in Arizona.

Hello.

WILL STONE, BYLINE: Hello. Great to be here.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: So the president and others, as I mentioned, point to a sharp rise in insurance premiums in Arizona since Obamacare became law. How big an issue is this for the people of Arizona?

STONE: It really depends on who you talk to. The number that was held up repeatedly was an average increase of about 116 percent for the benchmark plan here. The caveat is that most people don’t feel that price hike because they’re insulated by the tax credits under the Affordable Care Act. The Republican replacement for that would have lowered the tax credits relatively significantly for a place like Arizona. And the question would have been – how would people have afforded premiums?

The real problem, though, has been the marketplace and how insurers have slowly left. This is having an impact – the high deductibles and the lack of options – on real people. I spoke with a mother, Corrine Bobby (ph), who lives just north of Phoenix. And her daughter was born with a complex congenital heart disease. And so she was thrilled when the ACA happened and her daughter could get coverage. But even to this day, she can’t afford insurance for the rest of her family.

CORRINE BOBBY: It’s amazing that my daughter has this lifesaving care now. But you’re going to force me to pay a penalty for something that I can’t afford for the rest of us. But that shouldn’t be my problem. My problem should be which insurance company I should be getting. That would be my problem.

STONE: They were looking at premiums costing the rest of them $400 to $600 a month and deductibles of more than $6,000 per person. And they just decided, you know, it’s not worth it.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: But there are people who have benefited?

STONE: Yes, people – the 200,000 people in the marketplace, many of whom can now afford insurance with the tax credits. And then 400,000 plus people in Arizona benefited from Medicaid expansion. And that was the big concern here when – as the Republicans moved to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: So what are Arizona politicians saying now that it’s clear the ACA will be with us for the foreseeable future?

STONE: Our members of Congress were divided about whether they were going to support this bill or not. We had two members who had said they would vote for the bill. And then we had members in the far-right Freedom Caucus who said it did not go far enough, and they were going to oppose it.

So I think we will see our representatives in Congress saying we still need to do something about this law, and it needs to be something that works and actually brings down costs. And I’m sure some people here are breathing a sigh of relief because the Republican replacement could have forced some tough decisions for things like Medicaid here in Arizona.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: So what’s next? Is there anything the state government can do to fix the problems with how the ACA is working in Arizona? Or do Arizonans just wait for it to explode as the president has suggested it will?

STONE: This is mostly in the hands of the federal government right now. Arizona was not one of the states that set up its own exchange. It participates in the healthcare.gov. And leading up to open enrollment last year, we saw the federal governor making efforts to woo insurers back into the marketplace, even after they were concerned about costs and losing money. The question is – will the Trump administration do the same? – and I think that’s what a lot of folks who rely on the coverage right now are wondering.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: That’s reporter Will Stone. He’s part of a reporting partnership between NPR, Kaiser Health News and member station KJZZ.

Thanks so much for being with us.

STONE: Thank you.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Trendy Hospital Clothing To Make Cancer Patients Dress 'Well' Even When Unwell

INGA Wellbeing women's back-opening dress snap tape sleeves.
  • INGA Wellbeing women’s back-opening dress snap tape sleeves.

    Stephanie Derouaux /Les Marquisettes

  • INGA Wellbeing back-opening nightdress with abdominal access.

    INGA Wellbeing back-opening nightdress with abdominal access.

    Stephanie Derouaux /Les Marquisettes

  • INGA Wellbeing jersey top with internal drain pockets.

    INGA Wellbeing jersey top with internal drain pockets.

    Stephanie Derouaux /Les Marquisettes

  • INGA Wellbeing men's jersey top and trousers.

    INGA Wellbeing men’s jersey top and trousers.

    Stephanie Derouaux /Les Marquisettes

  • INGA Wellbeing men's jersey top arm and chest access.

    INGA Wellbeing men’s jersey top arm and chest access.

    Stephanie Derouaux /Les Marquisettes

  • INGA Wellbeing's men's jersey trousers with leg access.

    INGA Wellbeing’s men’s jersey trousers with leg access.

    Stéphanie Derouaux/Les Marquisettes

  • INGA Wellbeing women's jersey trousers groin access.

    INGA Wellbeing women’s jersey trousers groin access.

    Stephanie Derouaux /Les Marquisettes

  • INGA Wellbeing's men's jersey trousers with groin access for catheterization and drains.

    INGA Wellbeing’s men’s jersey trousers with groin access for catheterization and drains.

    Stephanie Derouaux /Les Marquisettes

1 of 8

Undergoing treatment for cancer is hard enough by itself. And for many cancer patients who spend most of their time in a hospital, it gets even harder with the loss of basic comforts. The hospital’s sterile environment, the fluorescent lights and the disposable gowns do little to make medical treatment more bearable. Nikla Lancksweert, wanted to do a little something to help with that dehumanizing experience, focusing on an alternative for those uncomfortable hospital gowns.

Lancksweert is co-founder of INGA Wellbeing, which creates fashion-conscious clothing for patients. The 41-year-old entrepreneur who’s originally from the U.K, lived in Philadelphia for several years before moving to Brussels, Belgium, where she’s now based. She named the clothing line, INGA, in honor of her mom, who was diagnosed of ovarian cancer at the age of 52 and then underwent three years of intense medical treatment.

“During this time she often had to put on a hospital gown or sit in her underwear to be examined or treated by strangers,” Lancksweert says on her Website. “It was sad and worrying to see how my elegant, capable mother would, almost visibly, shrink. Be diminished. … Getting her out of the hospital gown and into clothes that looked ‘normal’ but that really worked became my obsession!”

Lancksweert’s mom died on Boxing Day, 2006. And a few years later, Lancksweert got the idea to create the clothing line. She teamed up with former public relations executive, Claire Robinson — whose mom was also a cancer patient — and fashion designer Fiona McGreal and in January this year, they officially launched the full collection of INGA Wellbeing.

INGA Wellbeing offers worldwide shipping and in Belgium and the U.K., the collection is also available via a few specialist online and bricks and mortar retailers. In its short existence, INGA has won awards for health innovation and well-being, among them Henry van de Velde, Janey Loves Platinum and Healthcare Think Tank.

NPR’s Lulu Garcia-Navarro spoke with Lancksweert, who endorses the sentiment, “INGA Wellbeing makes it possible to dress ‘well’ even when unwell,” about the motivation behind her brand and how she’s helping patients feel more comfortable and dignified fashion-wise as they battle cancer.


Interview Highlights Include Extended Web Only Content

INGA Wellbeing co-founders: (L-R) Fiona Mc Greal, Claire Robinson and Nikla Lancksweert.

Stephanie Derouaux /Les Marquisettes

hide caption

toggle caption

Stephanie Derouaux /Les Marquisettes

On how her road to create fashionable hospital clothing began with her mother

My mother was diagnosed with ovarian cancer when she was just 52 years old and suddenly plunged into the world of hospitals and medical treatment. And it was really notable to see how very quickly she lost her dignity. And it’s not intentionally so. Doctors and nurses certainly have every intention of being as respectful as they can of patients. It’s just if you’re wearing the wrong clothes then you have to be helped to dress and undress. Then you might not want to go for a walk, which means you end up sort of staying in your room and you become sort of institutionalized incredibly quickly.

On how she actually happened to start the clothing line

I was lucky enough to meet Claire Robinson whose own mother had breast cancer and who was experiencing much of the same issues that my mother had gone through. And then we realized that we needed to have somebody with real fashion design skills and not just determination. And so, we were lucky enough to meet Fiona McGreal who wanted to help us come up with a set of designs that really work in hospital but that look completely normal. And that for us was the key thing. … we wanted to de-stigmatize health.

On what has to be taken into consideration when designing clothing for patients

We worked with nurses to say, “OK, which parts of the body do you need to be able to get to most frequently?” And so we came up with the women, we have a back opening dress, which is actually the closest thing to a hospital gown. But you would never guess it. I’ve worn it in the playground. I’ve worn it to the supermarket, often meetings — not having had a chance to change — but it has all that sort of ease of opening in that it opens at the back and it also has openings down the arms and an a very discreet opening to the stomach.

On why it’s important to have patients feeling better about the way that they look

If you feel self-confident and therefore in charge of your medical treatment, then you are much more likely to want to get up and move around and ultimately recover faster and get home faster. This is the psychological element but there’s also a very physical aspect of it, which is if you don’t do those things if you just stay in bed, there’s actually a higher risk of infection and you lose your muscle tone much more quickly, which makes walking ultimately harder. So your hospital stay becomes longer.

On naming the fashion company after her mom and what she thinks her mom would think

I think she would be amazed. I’ve got nothing to do with the fashion world and I don’t think I’m known particularly for being fashionable. But I think she would be amazed. And in fact, Inga was my mother’s name but it’s only afterwards that I realized — looking it up — that actually means “a hero’s daughter.” And that’s very much how we feel, that this concept is in honor of the heroes in our life. And I hope brings a great deal of comfort and dignity to others and just break this vicious cycle that patients often find themselves in.

NPR’s James Delahoussaye contributed to this report.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

States Give New Parents Baby Boxes To Encourge Safe Sleep Habits

Twins Ryan and Nell Stimpert lie in their baby boxes at home in Cleveland. The cardboard boxes are safe and portable places for the babies to sleep.

Maddie McGarvey for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

Maddie McGarvey for NPR

For Jernica Quiñones, the reality of sudden infant death syndrome, or SIDS, hit close to home this year when a friend woke up on New Year’s Day and discovered the lifeless body of her baby girl.

That’s why Quiñones’ 4-month-old son, Bless’n, has spent a lot of his life so far sleeping in a cardboard box.

The 33-year-old mother of five took part in a program in New Jersey that promotes safe sleep education through the distribution of “baby boxes” that double as bassinets.

“Some mothers can’t buy a Pack-n-Play or a crib,” Quiñones says. And that can lead to bed sharing, a risk factor for SIDS.

The program is a riff on Finland’s well-known baby box, or maternity package, which the government gives to expectant mothers who get a prenatal checkup: It’s the box, plus clothing, blankets and other supplies.

Now that Finnish model is making inroads in the U.S., but with a twist. Instead of being a prenatal incentive, it’s being used to deliver a postpartum safe sleep message.

Jernica Quiñones and her son, Bless’n. Quiñones was one of the first people to receive a free baby box in New Jersey.

Courtesy of Jernica Quiñones

hide caption

toggle caption

Courtesy of Jernica Quiñones

This week, Alabama will join Ohio and New Jersey in making free baby boxes available to the families of all newborns in the state. Parents watch online videos about SIDS and safe sleep and complete a short quiz. They can pick up a box at a local distribution center or have it mailed to them. The sturdy, portable box comes with a firm foam mattress and tight-fitting sheet; also included are breastfeeding accessories, a onesie, diapers and wipes.

New Jersey plans to distribute 105,000 boxes; Ohio, 140,000; Alabama, 60,000. The boxes are provided by the California-based Baby Box Co., which also helps produce the educational videos, hosted on its Babybox University website and tailored to local communities.

“The whole premise is that people like free things,” says Dr. Kathryn McCans, chair of New Jersey’s Child Fatality and Near Fatality Review Board, which is partnering with the Baby Box Co. for the New Jersey program. “It’s about getting the information out there.”

“Through education and awareness, people can make better choices and hopefully we can see fewer children dying,” she says.

There are about 3,500 sudden unexpected infant deaths a year in the U.S. The rate dropped significantly after the launch of 1994’s Back to Sleep campaign, which urged parents to put their babies to sleep on their back. But after a plateau, the rate has seen a slight uptick in recent years.

By comparison, Finland began its baby box program 80 years ago, when nearly one out of every 10 children in the country died before age 1. To qualify, women must get a health check before the end of their fourth month of pregnancy. Now, the country has one of the world’s lowest infant mortality rates.

In Ohio, the free baby box comes with educational materials, books, diapers, wipes and clothes.

Maddie McGarvey for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

Maddie McGarvey for NPR

In the U.S., it’s impossible to require pregnant women to get a prenatal checkup. Instead, the New Jersey and Ohio programs rely on educating new moms through videos.

With a running time of 15 to 20 minutes, the videos reflect the American Academy of Pediatrics safe sleep guidelines, which includes advice to put babies to sleep alone on a firm mattress, with no toys or soft bedding in the crib.

Ryan Stimpert, a mother of twins in Cleveland, received some of the first baby boxes in the Ohio program, which launched this month. She says she would have been a lot less anxious if she’d had them when her son and daughter came home from the hospital in December. “You don’t have to research, you don’t have to text a friend, you just know it’s a safe place,” the 36-year-old says.

The Baby Box Co. says its boxes are tested to meet Consumer Product Safety Commission standards for bassinets, although they aren’t yet subject to mandatory safety standards. In most cases, the baby box can be used for the first six months of life. The risk of SIDS is greatest between two and four months.

It’s a cool box, and a great hook for safe sleep education. But how effective is this approach?

Dave and Kyle Stimpert check on Ryan and Nell. They received the free boxes after learning about preventing SIDS through safe sleep practices.

Maddie McGarvey for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

Maddie McGarvey for NPR

People certainly are attracted by the free baby box. And the program has reached more people in less time than some of the state’s other safe-sleep efforts, McCans says.

Since the New Jersey program began in January, approximately 17,000 boxes have been distributed; in Ohio, 6,000 boxes have been distributed since its program launched earlier this month.

Ultimately, McCans doesn’t care whether babies actually sleep in the boxes.

“I’m not wedded to the box itself. It’s about the education,” she says. And, she says, it’s about making the boxes available to everyone so no one feels stigmatized.

Dr. Kristi Watterberg, chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ committee on the fetus and newborn, applauds the effort but worries that the process — learning about the program, going online, watching the videos and taking a quiz — may be too overwhelming or complicated for the people who need the education the most.

“The people who can really benefit from this are those who don’t have any clue what you need when you take a baby home,” she says. “They don’t have the social structure to support them. These are the moms who most need what’s in that box and the box itself.”

Watterberg also doesn’t want to see videos take the place of prenatal care, which remains the most important factor for healthy babies.

A study underway at Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia, a city with one of the highest infant mortality rates in the U.S., may yield some answers.

In the study’s first phase, mothers who delivered at the hospital received standard postpartum talks about SIDS, shaken baby syndrome and other topics. The hospital followed up with a phone call that included questions about risk factors for SIDS, such as bed sharing.

The results: Within 72 hours of leaving the hospital, 6.3 percent of mothers self-reported co-sleeping with their babies — just after they were told not to.

Those findings are lower than the national rate, which is 11.2 percent of parents co-sleeping with infants 7 months and younger, according to the National Infant Sleep Position Study.

“We identified the lack of a place for the baby to sleep as a risk factor for bed sharing,” says Dr. Megan Heere, medical director of the well baby nursery at Temple University Hospital.

The study’s second phase, which ended in November, introduced the baby box and a revamped educational component. Every mother had a one-on-one discussion exclusively about safe sleep with a specially trained nurse. The sessions lasted up to 45 minutes.

At discharge, new moms were given a baby box and taught how to use it. They also got a review of safe-sleep practices and watched a three-minute video provided by the Baby Box Co. The results are expected in May.

Heere hopes the baby box helps promote the cause of safe sleep, but she’s skeptical about the videos.

“Videos can be on and nobody watches them,” she says.

About a month after Quiñones, the New Jersey mom, watched the BabyBox University videos, she can quickly recall what she learned: That breastfeeding reduces the risk of SIDS, that you shouldn’t use bumpers or put teddy bears in the crib. Though she’s not a first-time mom, Quiñones says those facts were all new to her.

And word of the baby boxes has spread: Her sister and a friend have gotten them, too.

“Everyone wants a baby box,” Quiñones says. But the best part of the program, she says, is that it’s raising awareness: “I’m excited even if it saves one child.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Failed House Vote Is 'A Great Opportunity' For Republicans, Former House Leader Says

Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay leaves Capitol Hill, in September 2013, after a Texas appeals court tossed out his criminal conviction, saying there was insufficient evidence for a jury in 2010 to have found him guilty of illegally funneling money to Republican candidates.

Carolyn Kaster/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Carolyn Kaster/AP

After yesterday’s pulled health care vote, many on the leftand the right are seeing it as a failure for Republicans — but former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay says it’s actually a blessing in disguise.

Tom DeLay served in Congress as representative for Texas’s 22nd district from 1984 to 2005, when he resigned in the midst of a money laundering scandal. In 1995, DeLay was elected House Majority Whip and in 2002, he was elected House Majority Leader.

DeLay gained a reputation for his ability to whip votes — he became known as “The Hammer” and still claims he never lost a vote in his time in Congress.

DeLay spoke to Michel Martin on Weekend All Things Considered about how Congressional Republicans can move forward after the failure of this vote.


Interview Highlights

On why the American Health Care Act failed

I did see it coming — I want to kind of put it in perspective, because I’m no guru, but the beginning of the end for this bill started in 2010.

The American people were demanding that Obamacare be repealed. They weren’t demanding replacement — replacement came as a political move by the politicians to respond to the liberal media and to the Democrats, who were complaining that, “If you’re going to repeal, what are you going to replace it with?”

This whole replacement idea is the reason it failed, because when they came and they wrote write a bill without checking with their members — which is always a bad idea — they wrote a bill that basically kept Obamacare in place.

On DeLay’s health care philosophy

I don’t believe health care is a right. It’s a responsibility. The Democrats and Obama feel it’s a right and the federal government has a right to be involved in your health insurance. So that’s where I come from. This whole notion that the government can run a health insurance is doomed to failure in the first place.

The problem is you have some that have been elected in the House and the Senate that we call moderates that believe that the federal government has a constitutional role in health insurance. But the base of the party, as exhibited by the last four elections, wanted repeal of Obamacare because they basically understood that it was wrong and something needed to be done about it.

On how to unite Republicans in Congress

I invented a whole new process of whipping the vote, and I called it “grow the vote.” It was much harder to do, but what I did for 11 years as the Majority Whip and never lost a vote, was I had an agenda, that agenda was developed with our members, and once they bought into the agenda, we would check with our members before we even attempted to write the bill or introduce it, so that we knew where they were.

So by the time the members got to the point of voting, they had ownership in the bill and they wanted to vote for it — I didn’t have to break legs. That’s the way the Democrats do it, and now it’s the way the Republicans do it, if you looked at what happened over the last couple of weeks.

On whether President Trump is tearing the Republican party apart

I’m off of that. I don’t think he’ll tear the Republican party apart. …He tried to work with Congress on a failed strategy and he accepted their strategy rather than demanding his strategy. I think he’s learning. I think this was a good experience for them. To be honest, I think right now, after yesterday, it’s a great opportunity to move forward on Obamacare.

Now we can back up and do the things that should have been done. The situation is we have people that it’s hard for them to afford health insurance right now, and frankly, the health insurance market is totally shattered. And so what we need to do is rebuild that market — and the way the federal government can do that is get out of the way.

I would take Rand Paul’s idea that I heard last night: Come to the Senate floor next week, and pass a bill that allows people with pre-existing conditions to join pools, associations, co-ops, to buy insurance, and show that you’re going to remove the government and the regulatory structure away from it, so that the insurance companies can sell to people the kinds of policies they want.

And while you’re doing all of that, the whole Obamacare implosion that’s going on is going to raise the political pressure to repeal Obamacare. So the whole idea is those that want health insurance and can’t afford it, you’re helping them afford it, and at the same time, getting ready to just repeal Obamacare, and it’s a place for them to go.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)