A Senior Women’s Soccer League

As the women’s World Cup continues in France, there’s another group of tough athletes taking the field in the San Diego area. Many are age 70 and older. Don’t even think about telling them to sit.



LULU GARCIA-NAVARRO, HOST:

The U.S. women will play England in the semi-final round of the World Cup on Tuesday. And so we thought we’d bring you the story of some other tough and inspirational female soccer players. Gloria Hillard reports from San Diego, Calif., at the matchup between the blues and the whites.

UNIDENTIFIED PERSON #1: OK, ladies (clapping). Blues over there. Whites over here.

GLORIA HILLARD, BYLINE: In a purple headscarf and wearing for the blue team, Tina Zucker is getting in some last-minute dribbling practice.

TINA ZUCKER: Well, the thing about playing soccer and being 70 is I don’t feel 70.

HILLARD: Although she admits when she’s out and about and wearing her soccer uniform, people will often ask…

ZUCKER: Do you play soccer or do you coach soccer or do you go to see your grandchildren? I’m like, I play. And that’s the thing that all of us go through.

UNIDENTIFIED PERSON #2: Come on, Ladies. Keep coming. Keep coming. Oh, my God.

HILLARD: Most of these women play for the Prime of Life Women’s Soccer League in San Diego. They are not only playing a game they love. They are sharing the dreams of a younger generation, something they couldn’t have imagined as young girls – a U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team. Seventy-two-year-old Joan Captain says in the 1950s and ’60s and before Title IX, girls were often discouraged from playing sports.

JOAN CAPTAIN: When I grew up, you had to be a, quote, quote, “a lady.”

HILLARD: She’s changing out her jersey so there will be an equal number of good players on each team and doing pushups.

CAPTAIN: I usually play forward or I usually play defense. I had people say, oh, that’s so dangerous, you know, you should take it easy. And I say, well, you see that couch over there? The couch will kill you (laughter).

UNIDENTIFIED PERSON #3: Nice job, Trish, even if you are on the other team.

HILLARD: Brandi Mitchell of San Diego Soccer Women says these women are a demographic that should be recognized.

BRANDI MITCHELL: They’ve gone against, culturally, what we expect of women in those age groups not only as athletes but specifically with a sport that you just don’t see being offered to women of older ages in general.

HILLARD: At 79, Danielle Madsen has been playing soccer for 40 years – maybe not as hard and tough as two decades ago.

DANIELLE MADSEN: On our two teams, they’re very nice. And they don’t kill you (laughter). So playing against some of the other teams – yeah, you can get hurt.

HILLARD: She’s referring to those young players in their 50s. There’s only one exception in senior women’s soccer – no slide tackling. And that’s just fine with Karen Tenney. She says she doesn’t notice how many times she hits the grass during the game. She just counts her bruises in the morning.

KAREN TENNEY: I’ve broken my wrist and my thumb, both from friendly fire. I still played with it. I put a cast on, I put bubble wrap on it so I could still play.

HILLARD: From the sidelines, cheering the women on are a few retired former team members along with Lucy, a golden retriever and mascot for both teams. Patty Storm says at this time in their life, the game is more about camaraderie than competition.

PATTY STORM: It’s just pulling together and supporting each other and getting some wonderful exercise.

HILLARD: The players do admit when it’s tournament time, it’s game on. In this game, well, there was some debate as to whether the score was 1-0 or tied. Tina Zucker just shrugs.

ZUCKER: Honestly, I have no idea. I just know that I ran after the ball. Sometimes, I got it. Sometimes, I didn’t. And that’s the name of the game.

HILLARD: A game she plays three times a week.

For NPR News, I’m Gloria Hillard.

(SOUNDBITE OF SOLIMINE AND BURKI’S “WHEN YOU’RE SMILING”)

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Politicians, Government Agencies Feud Over Payouts Tied To Opioid Epidemic

A 5ml dose of liquid oxycodone, an opioid pain relief medication, sits on a table in Washington, D.C., March 29, 2019. During the opioid epidemic, roughly 218,000 Americans have died from overdoses tied to prescription pain pills, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

EVA HAMBACH/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

EVA HAMBACH/AFP/Getty Images

Government officials are bickering over hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements paid by Big Pharma, stemming from the nation’s deadly opioid epidemic.

The pharmaceutical industry paid out more than half a billion dollars over the last year alone. All sides expect the scale of settlements to grow fast as more cases go to trial.

Drug companies are accused of kick-starting the addiction crisis by aggressively marketing opioid pain medications over the past two decades. During the epidemic, roughly 218,000 Americans have died from overdoses tied to prescription pain pills, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Federal, state and local officials have filed hundreds of lawsuits against drug companies, using different teams of lawyers, while often making substantially different claims and legal arguments.

A growing number of sources have told NPR they’re concerned that the effort to hold the pharmaceutical industry accountable could unravel into a legal fight between governments.

There’s no agreement in place for how payouts will be distributed. In recent days, feuding between local, state and federal agencies has begun to spill into the open.

In an Ohio courtroom this week, a federal judge suspended work on a plan to compensate 24,000 local governments for their opioid-related costs, after state attorneys general weighed in strongly against the proposal.

“If we get money, how are going to use it?” asked Joe Rice, an architect of the proposal, who leads a team of attorneys representing more than 1,200 local governments suing Big Pharma.

Their cases have been consolidated into a single trial set to begin in federal court in Ohio in October. “Let’s get a plan in place. Because it also has to fit together,” Rice added.

The federal judge overseeing the consolidated trial, Dan Polster, has repeatedly urged officials to come up with just such a roadmap for compensation that will hasten a “global” settlement with the drug industry.

But after Rice’s group came up with a concept that would involve every local government in the U.S. — creating a kind of super-sized class action lawsuit – state attorneys general cried foul.

“To certify a negotiation class so quickly and so early in the process, before everyone’s had a chance to determine what their best interest is, constitutes a new and novel procedure that could result in a grave miscarriage of justice,” cautioned Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, in a June 24 letter to Judge Polster.

The letter was co-signed by 26 other state attorneys general. Judge Polster delayed action on the plan until August.

Meanwhile, the federal government has entered the money fray, seeking to garnish “a portion” of Oklahoma’s recent $270 million settlement with Purdue Pharmaceuticals.

The demand came in a June 12 letter from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which argued that part of Purdue’s payout was meant to cover alleged Medicaid fraud, which harmed federal as well as state taxpayers.

“We are aware of the letter and are reviewing it,” wrote Alex Gerszewski, a spokesman for Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter, in an email to NPR. “This will not affect state revenue,” he added.

Even within individual states there are growing tensions over how opioid money will be allocated. When Hunter won Oklahoma’s settlement with Purdue in March, he agreed unilaterally to a plan for how the money would be spent.

The lion’s share won’t go to fund programs designed to aid people who are opioid-dependent, or to help local governments struggling with the crisis. Instead, Hunter agreed to divert roughly $200 million to pay for a new addiction research center at the Oklahoma State University in Tulsa.

State lawmakers in Oklahoma were furious. “Rose petals were not strewn in my path,” Hunter acknowledged in a speech before the Bipartisan Policy Council in Washington DC last month. “There was a great consternation with me going around the appropriations process.”

Now that the federal government is asking for its slice of the money, his plan has become even more controversial.

Oklahoma’s legislature has since passed a state law requiring that future opioid settlements go into the state’s general fund. Last week, the state’s politicians narrowly averted a legal clash over an $85 million payout from another drug firm called Teva Pharmaceuticals.

This money fight is playing out against the troubled history that followed the tobacco settlements of the 1990s. Cigarette makers agreed to pay more than $240 billion to end their liability for cancer deaths caused by their products.

But much of that cash has since been diverted by government officials away from health programs and campaigns aimed to reduce smoking rates.

Critics worry that drug industry settlements could also be used to fill budget gaps or to pay for local, state and federal programs unrelated to the opioid epidemic.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

U.S. Advances At Women’s World Cup

The U.S. has advanced to the semifinals of the Women’s World Cup after a thrilling 2-1 victory over host country France. It was the most anticipated game of the tournament so far.



SARAH MCCAMMON, HOST:

The U.S. is headed to the semifinals for the Women’s World Cup next week. That’s after Megan Rapinoe stole the show in the quarterfinal, scoring the two goals that powered the U.S. to yesterday’s win over France. That game took place in front of an emotionally charged crowd in a sold-out stadium in Paris. NPR’s Eleanor Beardsley was there.

(CHEERING)

ELEANOR BEARDSLEY, BYLINE: Megan Rapinoe set the tone of the game early, scoring a goal within the fifth minute. This pressured the French team to try to equalize throughout the first half. Though they had possession of the ball 60% of the time and took many shots, France was unable to pierce through the stifling U.S. defense. Rapinoe scored again in the second half, making it 2-0 and demoralizing an already desperate French team.

(CHEERING)

BEARDSLEY: Late in the second half, France finally scored its only goal, a header by Wendie Renard off a free kick.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED CROWD: (Chanting) Allez les Bleus.

BEARDSLEY: The stadium was bursting in red, white and blue, the colors of both countries’ flags. And the crowd was electric, erupting in alternating chants of Allez les Bleus and U-S-A, though the U-S-A chants attracted some boos from the majority-French fans.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED CROWD: (Chanting) U-S-A, U-S-A.

(BOOING)

BEARDSLEY: Parisian Aurelien Jeanpetit says whatever the score, this is a first for women’s soccer in France.

AURELIEN JEANPETIT: It’s the first time I witnessed that. It’s really incredible. The atmosphere is really something else, especially for – concerning women’s soccer because men’s soccer is the thing in our country. But, like, women’s soccer has never been like this. So it’s really – it makes me happy for every girl who plays football and who can watch that on TV.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED CROWD: (Singing in French).

BEARDSLEY: French fans sang their national anthem and believed up until the very end. But Les Bleus couldn’t take control from the U.S. team long enough to score. Cecile Creze admits France was outplayed.

CECILE CREZE: Well, I’m disappointed, of course, but it was logic because the American players were better. When they were in front of the goal, they scored. And the French team, they had the ball, but they didn’t manage to score, so disappointed because I think they could have done better.

BEARDSLEY: Rapinoe was again named player of the match, but lately, she’s just as known for what she says off the field. Her comments about the White House have galvanized anti-Trump Americans and won her a following in France.

UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Everybody – Megan, Megan, Megan.

BEARDSLEY: Shana Summers and her friends are wearing T-shirts they had specially made for the game. Paraphrasing Rapinoe’s expletive-laced comment that if the U.S. wins the World Cup, she’s not going to the White House. The women just arrived from San Francisco.

SHANA SUMMERS: We got this done yesterday and flew in this morning to make it to the game tonight with these shirts to show support for Megan Rapinoe because everything that’s happening in the U.S. and her speaking out is the biggest thing ever. And we need to be there in support for her.

BEARDSLEY: Megan Rapinoe, the U.S. team and all their supporters will be in Lyon Tuesday for the semifinal game against England. Eleanor Beardsley, NPR News, Paris.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Boston’s Suffolk Downs Holds Its Last Live Horse Races

Boston’s Suffolk Downs racetrack, once a hugely popular venue for a nationally beloved sport, is marking the end of an era as it hosts its last live horse race ever.



SARAH MCCAMMON, HOST:

It’s the end of an era for East Boston’s historic Suffolk Downs racetrack. Live horse racing, which began there in 1935, will end after one final race day tomorrow. Tori Bedford from member station WGBH brings us this from the track.

(SOUNDBITE OF BUGLE HORN)

TORI BEDFORD, BYLINE: It’s the second race of the day and hometown jockey Tammi Piermarini is soaring through the muddy track on Atta Kid, a horse that, unlike her, is just starting his career.

UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Come on, Tammi.

BEDFORD: Piermarini and Atta Kid fly through the finish line to win the race.

TAMMI PIERMARINI: You can walk right in the girl’s room. Just shut the door behind you.

BEDFORD: Piermarini is small and sturdy. She hops off her horse and meets me in the locker room where we talk while she wipes mud from the track off of her face.

PIERMARINI: 1985, I rode my first horse here.

BEDFORD: Piermarini is a local kid. She grew up in Newburyport and started riding at 3 years old. She came to Suffolk Downs at the age of 18 and went on to be the third leading female jockey in the country. It’s also where she rode her parents’ first racehorse.

PIERMARINI: That was probably one of the most exciting moments of my life to have them come into the winner’s circle and it’s their horse and their colors I’m wearing. I can’t express or explain how I felt.

BEDFORD: Jockeys like Piermarini have hitched their careers to a sport with waning interest around the country as casinos and online gambling grow in popularity in live horse racing spots, like Suffolk Downs, get transformed into apartments and retail buildings. With the retirement of the tracks, Piermarini says more jockeys and horses are retiring, too.

PIERMARINI: As long as people will ride me, I’m going to continue. But if I’m forced to retire because of no business – and that’s a sad way to go. It’s not that I want to retire. I’m being forced to retire.

BEDFORD: Just outside, a lot of longtime fans here say they aren’t quite ready to say goodbye. Jimmy Haephy grew up in nearby Revere and has been coming to the track for 40 years.

JIMMY HAEPHY: A lot of memories here, you know? A lot of good ones. I know every inch of this place. It’s like walking in my front door walking in here. And I don’t understand why they were closing it. Some reason they want to close, make a shopping mall. I don’t know.

BEDFORD: As a kid nearly 70 years ago, Conrad Smith, or Smitty, was obsessed with two things – baseball and horse racing, coming every weekend with his parents.

CONRAD SMITH: I’ve been doing this all my life, and I’m still coming here. I don’t know what’s going to happen after next year.

BEDFORD: Suffolk Downs used to bring in tens of thousands of spectators with races every day. Now CEO Chip Tuttle says the entire sport is struggling.

CHIP TUTTLE: We fought really hard for a long time to try to preserve racing here at the property, and it didn’t work out, so now it’s on to what’s next.

BEDFORD: Suffolk Downs has closed before and reopened, but Tuttle says this time it’s for real.

TUTTLE: There have been times in the past where we thought racing was going to end, it was over. And we were able to find ways to continue. But I can’t see a way for us to continue racing here.

TD THORNTON: We’ve got Rocket Road in those bright orange silks. He’s covered up on the…

BEDFORD: TD Thornton sits up on the roof in an announcer’s booth speaking into a decades-old microphone to let the crowd know which horses are racing next and pressing a bugle horn to bring those horses out onto the track. He says he doesn’t want the final race to feel like a funeral.

THORNTON: And we’ve had a pretty damn good run here for 84 years so that’s how I’m going to try and focus it and end it on a high note. This is reality, and my role in it is to give the track a respectful sendoff.

BEDFORD: What’s next for you?

THORNTON: Pressing his bugle right here and getting the horse out onto the track.

(SOUNDBITE OF BUGLE HORN)

THORNTON: Horses are heading out for today’s fourth race with the Exacta, Trifecta and Superfecta betting.

BEDFORD: For NPR News, I’m Tori Bedford in Boston.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Democrats Try To Distinguish Themselves On Health Care

NPR’s Sarah McCammon speaks with Julie Rovner of Kaiser Health News about the Democratic presidential candidates’ health care policies.



SARAH MCCAMMON, HOST:

Twenty of 24 presidential candidates got the chance to distinguish themselves this week during the first televised Democratic debates, hosted by NBC News. One subject that led to a spirited discussion – health care.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

BERNIE SANDERS: We will have “Medicare for All.”

KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND: I believe we need to get to universal health care as a right and not a privilege to single payer.

JOE BIDEN: You cannot let people who are sick, no matter where they come from, no matter what their status, go uncovered. You can’t do that.

MCCAMMON: That’s former Vice President Joe Biden and Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Bernie Sanders. Here to help us understand where the Democratic candidates agree and where they don’t is Julie Rovner, chief Washington correspondent for Kaiser Health News. Welcome.

JULIE ROVNER: Hi, Sarah.

MCCAMMON: So there seems to be consensus about some version at least of this idea of Medicare for All, but not everyone’s on the same page about what that phrase actually means. Julie, what does Medicare for All mean?

ROVNER: Well, it can mean a lot of things. That’s part of what’s so confusing about this debate. First of all, what Medicare are they talking about? Are they talking about the current Medicare that most people over age 65 have? That’s not really the case in a lot of these plans. They’re mostly talking about a new program that would have much broader, more comprehensive benefits. It wouldn’t require people to have copays or deductibles. Then the question is, what do they mean by all? Do they mean that everybody would go into this new Medicare program? Would they be required to give up private insurance they might have now, or would that be voluntary?

MCCAMMON: And why is that distinction important, whether it’s voluntary or something that people are just automatically in by virtue of being an American?

ROVNER: Well, we certainly learned during the implementation of the Affordable Care Act that the very few people who were basically required to give up their insurance were extremely unhappy about that. People may not like the private insurance that they have, but they’re terrified about going to something new that they fear might be worse.

MCCAMMON: And one telling moment in the debate was when candidates were asked to raise their hands if they would support coverage under a government plan for undocumented immigrants. And all of them did raise their hands on the second night of the debate. Here’s South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg explaining his position.

(SOUNDBTE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

PETE BUTTIGIEG: Our country is healthier when everybody is healthier. And remember; we’re talking about something people are given a chance to buy into.

MCCAMMON: Julie, were you surprised to see all the Democrats take that position, that they would cover undocumented immigrants in a government plan?

ROVNER: I was surprised. This was something that was a big issue during the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2009 and 2010. Undocumented immigrants were not allowed to sign up for expanded Medicaid or get subsidies on the insurance exchanges. It was a very sensitive issue. And I think Democrats were not very happy about that. But they felt that they literally could not get the bill passed if they were to allow undocumented people to take advantage of some of the benefits. And that seems to have really come around just in the last 10 years.

MCCAMMON: And President Trump tweeted during the debate, quote, “all Democrats just raised their hands for giving millions of illegal aliens unlimited health care. How about taking care of American citizens first? That’s the end of that race.” I mean, how might this issue play with general election voters?

ROVNER: Well, obviously, immigration is going to be almost as big an issue as health care, I suspect, going into 2020. And I think Democrats are sort of staking themselves out on the supportive of immigration side if only to contrast themselves with what’s going on at the southern border and President Trump. I have no idea how it’s going to play out, but it certainly seems like they’re not being shy about which side they’re on.

MCCAMMON: Another polarizing issue – we’ve heard candidates affirm support for abortion rights opposing the Hyde Amendment, for example, which bans federal funding for most abortions. Several Democratic candidates expressed support for covering abortion under Medicare or another government plan. Senator Elizabeth Warren, for example, when asked if she supports any limits on abortion didn’t directly answer that but pivoted to expressing support for reproductive rights in general. Julie, what is the rhetoric we’re hearing, say, about where the Democratic Party is on this issue right now?

ROVNER: Well, this has been a gradual but noticeable move to the left for the Democrats. There used to be a significant percentage of the party that were Democrats but didn’t support abortion. And Democrats had long been sort of careful about that flank of the party. There seemed to be fewer of them. It seems that both parties are moving sort of to the polls on this issue, Democrats being very supportive of abortion rights, Republicans being very unsupportive of abortion rights. And it makes me wonder what’s going to happen to those people in the middle because even though they’re not very well represented by the parties anymore, if you look at public opinion polls, there are a lot of people in that sort of middle group. And right now, it seems that neither party is really speaking to them.

MCCAMMON: You know, sort of a reality check here, Julie, if one of these Democrats wins in 2020, what can they actually do on this issue?

ROVNER: Well, obviously, it would take Congress to do a lot of things that some of these candidates are talking about, but it’s important to remember that the president alone has a lot of power through making federal rules. The Trump administration is very much rolling back access to abortion and birth control through its rulemaking authority. A Democratic president could reverse all of those things.

MCCAMMON: Well, that was Julie Rovner of Kaiser Health News. Thanks, Julie.

ROVNER: Thank you.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Have Cancer, Must Travel: Patients Left In Lurch After Town’s Hospital Closes

When the cancer clinic at Mercy Hospital Fort Scott closed in January, Karen Endicott-Coyan and other cancer patients had to continue their treatments out of town.

Christopher Smith for Kaiser Health News


hide caption

toggle caption

Christopher Smith for Kaiser Health News

One Monday in February, 65-year-old Karen Endicott-Coyan gripped the wheel of her black 2014 Ford Taurus with both hands as she made the hour-long drive from her farm near Fort Scott, Kan., to Chanute.

With a rare form of multiple myeloma, she requires weekly chemotherapy to keep the cancer at bay.

She made the trip in pain, having skipped her morphine for the day to be able to drive safely. Since she sometimes “gets the pukes” after treatment, she had her neighbor and friend Shirley Palmer, 76, come along to drive her back.

Continuity of care is crucial for cancer patients in the midst of treatment, which often requires frequent repeated outpatient visits. So when Mercy Hospital Fort Scott, the rural hospital in Endicott-Coyan’s hometown, was slated to close its doors at the end of 2018, hospital officials had arranged for its cancer clinic — called the “Unit of Hope” — to remain open.

Then “I got the email on Jan. 15,” said Reta Baker, the hospital’s CEO. It informed her that Cancer Center of Kansas, the contractor that operated and staffed the unit, had decided to shut it down too, just two weeks later.

“There are too many changes in that town” to keep the cancer center open, Yoosaf “Abe” Abraham, chief operating officer of the Cancer Center of Kansas later told KHN. He added that patients would be “OK” because they could get treated at the center’s offices in Chanute and Parsons.

From Fort Scott, those facilities are 50 and 63 miles away, respectively.

For Endicott-Coyan and dozens of other cancer patients, the distance meant new challenges getting lifesaving treatment. “You have a flat tire, and there is nothing out here,” Endicott-Coyan said, waving her arm toward the open sky and the pastures dotted with black Angus and white-faced Hereford cattle on either side of the shoulderless, narrow highway she now must drive to get to her chemo appointment.

Karen Endicott-Coyan has a rare form of multiple myeloma and now has to drive an hour from her farm near Fort Scott, Kan., for weekly chemotherapy injections.

Christopher Smith for Kaiser Health News


hide caption

toggle caption

Christopher Smith for Kaiser Health News

Nationwide, more than 100 rural hospitals have closed since 2010. In each case, a unique but familiar loss occurs.

Residents, of course, lose health care services as wards are shut and doctors and nurses begin to move away.

But the ripple effect can be equally devastating. The economic vitality of a community takes a blow without the hospital’s high-paying jobs and it becomes more difficult for other industries to attract workers who want to live in a town with a hospital. Whatever remains is at risk of withering without the support of the stabilizing institution.

The 7,800 residents of Fort Scott are reeling from the loss of their 132-year-old community hospital, which was closed at the end of December by Mercy, a St. Louis-based nonprofit health system. Founded on the frontier in the 19th century and rebuilt as a 69-bed modern facility in 2002, the hospital had outlived its use, with largely empty inpatient beds, the parent company said.

For the next year, Kaiser Health News and NPR will track how its citizens fare after the closure in the hopes of answering pressing national questions: Do citizens in small communities like Fort Scott need a traditional hospital for their health needs? If not a hospital, what then?

Traveling the distance for cancer care

Reta Baker, the hospital’s CEO grew up on a farm south of Fort Scott. She understood that the hospital’s closure was unavoidable. She scrambled to make sure basic health care needs would be met afterward.

Mercy agreed to keep the building open and lights on until 2021. And Baker recruited a federally qualified health center to take over four outpatient clinics, including one inside the hospital; former employees were bought out and continue to operate a rehabilitation center; and the nonprofit Ascension Via Christi Hospital in Pittsburg reopened the emergency department in February.

But cancer care, which requires specialists and the purchase and storage of a range of oncology drugs, presents unique challenges in rural areas.

Rural cancer patients typically spend 66% more time traveling each way to treatment than those who live in more urban areas, according to a recent national survey by ASCO, the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Dr. Monica Bertagnolli, a cattle rancher’s daughter who is now chair of ASCO’s board, called this a “tremendous burden.” Cancer care, she explained, is “not just one visit and you’re done.”

ASCO used federal data to find that while about 19% of Americans live in rural areas, only 7% of oncologists practice there.

People in rural America are more likely to die from cancer than those in the country’s metropolitan counties, according to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report in 2017. It found 180 cancer deaths per 100,000 people a year in rural counties, compared with 158 deaths per 100,000 in populous metropolitan counties.

The discrepancy is partly because habits like smoking are more common among rural residents, but the risk of dying goes beyond that, said Jane Henley, a CDC epidemiologist and lead author of the report. “We know geography can affect your risk factors, but we don’t expect it to affect mortality.”

From an office inside a former Mercy outpatient clinic, Fort Scott’s cancer support group, Care to Share, continues its efforts to meet some of the community’s needs — which in some ways have increased since the Unit of Hope closed. It provides Ensure nutritional supplements, gas vouchers and emotional support to cancer patients.

Lavetta Simmons, one of the support group’s founders, said she will have to raise more money to help people pay for gas so they can drive farther to treatments. Last year, in this impoverished corner of southeastern Kansas, Care to Share spent more than $17,000 providing gas money to area residents who had to travel to the Mercy hospital or farther away for care.

The group expects to spend more on gas this year, having spent nearly $6,000 during the first four months of 2019.

And the reserves of donated Ensure from Mercy are running out, so Simmons is reaching out to hospitals in nearby counties for help.

With Mercy Hospital Fort Scott closed, the likelihood of residents here dying from their cancer will grow, experts worry, because it’s that much harder to access specialists and treatments.

Krista Postai, who took over the Fort Scott hospital’s four primary care clinics, said it’s not unusual for her staff to “see someone walk in [with] end-stage cancer that they put off because they didn’t have money, they didn’t have insurance, or it’s just the way you are… We wait too long here.”

‘If they can’t cure me, I’m done’

Art Terry, 71, a farmer and Vietnam veteran, was one of them. Doctors discovered Terry’s cancer after he broke a rib while bailing hay. When they found a mass below his armpit, it was already late-stage breast cancer that had metastasized to his bones.

Art Terry, center, and members of his family stand for photo at the Mercy Hospital Fort Scott cancer unit before it closed in January. He died days before the closure.

Dwight Terry


hide caption

toggle caption

Dwight Terry

With his twice-weekly chemotherapy treatment available in the “Unit of Hope,” Terry spent hours there with his son and grandchildren telling stories and jokes as if they were in their own living room. The nurses began to feel like family, and Terry brought them fresh eggs from his farm.

“Dad couldn’t have better or more personalized care anywhere,” said his son, Dwight, bleary-eyed after a factory shift.

Terry knew it was difficult to find trustworthy cancer care. The shortage of cancer specialists in southeastern Kansas meant that many, including Mercy Hospital Fort Scott’s patients, counted on traveling oncologists to visit their communities once or twice a week.

Wichita-based Cancer Center of Kansas has nearly two dozen locations statewide. It began leasing space in Fort Scott’s hospital basement in the mid-2000s, the center’s Abraham said. The hospital provided the staff while the Cancer Center of Kansas paid rent and sent roving oncologists to drop in and treat patients.

At its closing, the Unit of Hope served nearly 200 patients, with about 40% of them receiving chemotherapy treatment.

When Art Terry was diagnosed, his son, Dwight, tried to talk to him about seeking treatment at the bigger hospitals and academic centers in Joplin, Mo., or the Kansas City area. The elder Terry wasn’t interested. “He’s like, ‘Nope,’ ” Dwight Terry recalled. “I’m going right there to Fort Scott. If they can’t cure me, I’m done. I’m not driving.’ “

In the end, as the elder Terry struggled to stay alive, Dwight said he would have driven his father the hour to Chanute for treatment. Gas — already a mounting expense as they traveled the 20 miles from the farm near tiny Prescott, Kan., to Fort Scott — would be even more costly. And the journey would be taxing for his father, who traveled so little over the course of his life that he had visited Kansas City only twice in the past 25 years.

As it turned out, the family never had to make a choice. Art Terry’s cancer advanced to his brain and killed him days before the hospital’s cancer unit closed.

What happens next?

As Endicott-Coyan and her friend Palmer drove to Chanute for treatment, they passed the time chatting about how the hospital’s closure is changing Fort Scott. “People started putting their houses up for sale,” Palmer said.

Like many in Fort Scott, they had both spent their days at the Fort Scott hospital. Endicott-Coyan worked in administration for more than 23 years; Palmer volunteered with the auxiliary for six years.

The hospital grew with the community. But as the town’s fortunes fell, it’s perhaps no surprise that the hospital couldn’t survive. But the intertwined history of Mercy and Fort Scott is also why its loss hit so many residents so hard.

Fort Scott began in 1842 when the U.S. government built a military fort to help with the nation’s westward expansion. Historians say Fort Scott was a boomtown in the years just after the Civil War, with its recorded population rising to more than 10,000 as the town competed with Kansas City to become the largest railroad center west of the Mississippi.

The hospital was an integral part of the community after Sisters of Mercy nuns opened a 10-bed hospital in 1886 with a mission to serve the needy and poor. Baker, Mercy Hospital Fort Scott’s president, said the cancer center was an extension of that mission.

Mercy Hospital Fort Scott’s cancer clinic had windows overlooking the front parking lot and forested land beyond.

Christopher Smith For Kaiser Health News


hide caption

toggle caption

Christopher Smith For Kaiser Health News

The Unit of Hope began operating out of the newest hospital building’s basement, which was “pretty cramped,” Baker said. As cancer treatments improved, it grew so rapidly that Mercy executives moved it to a spacious first-floor location that had previously been the business offices.

“Our whole purpose when we designed it was for it to be a place where somebody who was coming to have something unpleasant done could actually feel pampered and be in a nice environment,” Baker said.

The center, with its muted natural grays and browns, had windows overlooking the front parking lot and forested land beyond. Every patient could look out the windows or watch a personal television terminal. Each treatment chair had plenty of space for family members to pull up chairs.

When Endicott-Coyan and Palmer arrived at the Cancer Center of Kansas clinic in Chanute in February, things looked starkly different. Patients entered a small room through a rusted back door. Three brown infusion chairs sat on either side of the entry door and two TV monitors were mounted high on the walls.

A nurse checked Endicott-Coyan’s blood pressure and ushered her back to a private room to get a shot in her stomach. She was ready to leave about 15 minutes later.

The center’s Abraham said the Chanute facility is “good for patients for the time being” and not a “Taj Mahal” like Mercy’s Fort Scott hospital building, which he said was too expensive to maintain. Cancer Center of Kansas plans to open a clinic at a hospital in Girard, which is about 30 miles from Fort Scott, he said.

Some oncology doctors would say driving is not necessary. Indeed, a few health care systems across the country, such as Sanford Health in South Dakota and Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals in Pennsylvania, are administering some chemotherapy in patients’ homes. Oncologist Adam Binder, who practices at Thomas Jefferson in Philadelphia, said “over 50% of chemotherapy would be safe to administer in the home setting if the right infrastructure existed.”

But the infrastructure —that is, the nurses who would travel to treat patients and a reimbursement model to pay for such care within our complex health care system — is not yet in place.

Back in the car, Palmer took the wheel and Endicott-Coyan began planning for future cancer treatments in the void left by Mercy Hospital Fort Scott’s closure. “I put a note on Facebook today and said ‘OK, I have drivers for the rest of February; I need drivers for March!’ “

Kaiser Health News is a nonprofit news service covering health issues. It is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation that is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Saturday Sports: Women’s World Cup, Wimbledon

The Women’s World Cup is underway, while top tennis players are about to meet at Wimbledon.



SARAH MCCAMMON, HOST:

And now it’s time for sports.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

MCCAMMON: The Women’s World Cup is going on in France during one of Europe’s worst heat waves. Bringing in the heat here is NPR’s Tom Goldman. Good morning, Tom.

TOM GOLDMAN, BYLINE: Sarah, welcome to the sports segment.

MCCAMMON: Thank you so much. So the U.S. women’s soccer team as we know defeated France 2-1. It was an evening game. They played in that 85 degree heat. What were the highlights for you?

GOLDMAN: Well, now that you mentioned the heat, hydration, definitely a highlight, but other than that, defense – Megan Rapinoe. The defense was a question mark for the U.S. going into the World Cup, but it was stellar yesterday, especially in the second half after France scored and really started to bring the pressure. The U.S. kept repelling attack after attack. But the big story, of course, Megan Rapinoe. She played a beautiful game. She was relentless on the left wing and, of course, she scored both U.S. goals. She’s now scored all the American goals in the last two victories. She has five total. But beyond that, she really has become a phenomenon at this World Cup, in case you haven’t heard – the purple hair, the outspoken political views. She’s a supporter of NFL player Colin Kaepernick and his protests during the national anthem. She’s protested herself. She’s in a war of words with President Trump. So Rapinoe is becoming this polarizing character, loved and hated. But I tell you, Sarah, she’s loving her moment. She and her teammates aren’t shrinking from being the favorites. In fact, they seem to be thriving on the pressure.

MCCAMMON: And a lot of people are loving her. They face England next. England defeated Norway 3-0. So what do you think will happen in the semifinals?

GOLDMAN: The U.S. will beat England, and then the U.S. will beat whoever they play in the final. Sarah, I’m usually a rotten prognosticator – not this time. They’re just really good. Next question, please.

MCCAMMON: All right, we’re going to hold you to that.

GOLDMAN: OK.

MCCAMMON: Two former star U.S. soccer players, Brandi Chastain and Michelle Akers, announced this week, Tom, that they will participate in a Boston University brain study. I want you to talk a little bit about that and why it matters.

GOLDMAN: Well, Akers and Chastain are two of the stars of that great 1999 World Cup-winning U.S. team, and they say they’ve dealt with different symptoms like memory loss and headaches. And they wonder if a lifetime of heading the ball and collisions have put them and other female soccer players at risk of CTE, chronic traumatic encephalopathy. That’s the degenerative brain disease most associated with football. Now, it matters because, in sports, traumatic brain injury mostly has been talked about as a problem for male athletes because of football and other collision sports that men play. But in fact soccer, especially at the younger levels, has been particularly brutal to the heads of women and girls. A 2017 study by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons found girls soccer number one when it comes to concussions as a percentage of total injuries. Studies like that have led some to call for reducing or even eliminating heading the ball for younger players.

MCCAMMON: And moving on to another big tournament starting Monday, this one in the U.K., we are talking, of course, about Wimbledon. On the women’s side, as per usual, it’s anybody’s championship. In the last 10 Grand Slam tournaments, there’ve been nine different female champions. For the men, No. 1 ranked Novak Djokovic will be trying to defend his title. But this year, he’s got some real challengers. What do you think, Tom? Can he do it again?

GOLDMAN: Oh, sure he can. Before losing in the semifinals of the French Open earlier this month, he’d won the three previous Grand Slam tournaments. He’s a worthy No. 1 seed, but right behind him, of course, are the rest of the big three of men’s tennis, Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal. Those three combined have won 14 of the last 16 Wimbledon’s men’s titles, led by Federer with eight. It’s a good bet one of them will keep it going by the end of the Wimbledon fortnight. They’re all playing great.

MCCAMMON: And quickly, we also have to mention that one player has made an unlikely comeback, the U.K.’s own Andy Murray. He had an emotional departure last year followed by hip surgery. Now he’s back and he seems pretty happy, right?

GOLDMAN: The dower Scotsman has been smiling and been cheery in recent weeks, you know, because he’s not hurting. He’s winning doubles at least. A few years back, Murray was a frequent challenger to the big three. Then earlier this year, he thought he was going to have to quit tennis. But after surgery, a new partial metal hip, he’s been winning at doubles, and U.K. fans at Wimbledon are going to be cheering him on like crazy to win a doubles title.

MCCAMMON: That’s NPR sports correspondent Tom Goldman. Tom, thanks so much.

GOLDMAN: You’re welcome.

(SOUNDBITE OF THE ROOFTOPS’ “A LAYER FITS”)

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

U.S. Wins Again At Women’s World Cup, Defeating Host France

American player Megan Rapinoe, right, celebrates after scoring her team’s first goal during the Women’s World Cup quarterfinal soccer match between France and the United States Friday.

Alessandra Tarantino/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Alessandra Tarantino/AP

Pick your superlative and chances are someone, somewhere used it to describe this game at some point. Epic. Intense. Pressure-packed. Match of the tournament. Regardless of the term, the Women’s World Cup quarterfinal game lived up to the hype. One versus four. Defending champion against the host country favorite. The U.S. was crisp and powerful from the first whistle until the final one. It beat France 2-1.

The U.S. got the scoring started early. After Alex Morgan was fouled just outside the France penalty area, Megan Rapinoe lined up to take the free kick. The shot was a laser. The ball sliced through a sea of U.S. and French players, untouched, and found the back of the net in the 5th minute. It was the first time France had trailed in this Women’s World Cup.

WOW. US fans go wild as @mPinoe draws first blood, launching free kick into the goal in the 5th minute. #USA 1 – #FRA 0 pic.twitter.com/wzBzqslntw

— melissa block (@NPRmelissablock) June 28, 2019

The U.S. was on the attack all half long with runs deep into the French backfield. It was a physical contest as both teams battled the heat and each other at Parc des Princes stadium in Paris. The Americans were buoyed by their defense which stifled the French, closing down countless scoring opportunities. Crystal Dunn, Julie Ertz and Kelley O’Hara suffocated the French scorers shutting them out in the first half.

The second half started just like the first. A strong U.S. attack right from the get-go The U.S. launched two shots on goal in the seconds after the opening whistle. Corner kicks, powerful strikes and fortunate bounces all were in the Americans’ favor. France had more success after their halftime adjustments with several scoring chances but also several unforced errors.

The United States still found a way to dissect the French defense in the second half and it came courtesy of Megan Rapinoe again. She powered home a blistering shot in the 65th minute after a Tobin Heath assist skittered in front of the French goal. Rapinoe also scored both goals in the last game against Spain.

France finally found the back of the net in the 81st minute with a sparkling header by Wendie Renard. The 6-foot-2-inch defender is the tallest player in the Women’s World Cup. The score energized the French crowd (and the French team) which had been relatively quiet since the early goal from Megan Rapinoe. But the U.S. found a way to withstand a furious French attack.

It was the 10th straight World Cup win for the U.S. (tying Norway). The United States is seeking to become just the second nation to win successive World Cups (Germany 2003 & 2007). After this emotional win against France, the road doesn’t get any easier for the Americans. The U.S. takes on England in the semifinals on Tuesday.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Toronto Removed Basketball Hoops From Parks Every Day. Then A Tweet Called It Out

City workers in Toronto removed basketball hoops each evening from some city parks because of noise complaints. After an outcry, the city says the rims will stay up.



Hakan Dahlstrom/Flickr


hide caption

toggle caption



Hakan Dahlstrom/Flickr

The Toronto Raptors won the NBA Championship earlier this month, and the team’s thrilling run has boosted the city’s excitement about basketball to a new level.

But you wouldn’t know it, watching a video posted this week of a Toronto city worker removing a basketball hoop from an outdoor court at one of the city’s parks.

Absolutely sickening display @cityoftoronto let the kids play!!! pic.twitter.com/myjsOvZEc0

— Mitch Robson (@_mitchrobson) June 26, 2019

As a child dribbles a ball on a gorgeous sunny day, the worker takes down the rims, leaving nothing but backboard.

A young man assures the camera that even without the hoops, “I can have just as much fun out here.” He goes in for the layup … but there’s nowhere to put the ball. It ricochets off the backboard.

The hoops’ removal wasn’t a one-off, captured by chance: It was policy. For years, city workers have removed the hoops each evening from some Toronto parks, in response to noise complaints from neighbors.

City spokesperson Brad Ross told Toronto’s Star newspaper that crews “would make their way to various parkettes … and remove the nets and replace them the next day to mitigate noise complaints.”

Then came Mitch Robson’s tweet on Wednesday, which made the Canadian city look, well, somewhat hostile to joy and exercise. As of Friday afternoon, the video had been viewed more than 1.5 million times.

Canada’s basketball governing body soon weighed in, posting a doctored photo showing the Raptors playing on a basket without a hoop. “No rim. No history. Everyone deserves the chance to play. Keep the nets up,” it urged.

No rim. No history.

Everyone deserves the chance to play. Keep the nets up. #WeAreTeamCanada pic.twitter.com/IvHq8BBtk2

— Canada Basketball (@CanBball) June 27, 2019

The city responded quickly.

Within hours, Toronto Mayor John Tory announced his disapproval of the practice.

“The City should be putting basketball nets up not pulling them down,” he tweeted. “I’ve delivered that message to our parks staff tonight — they agree. We should absolutely be encouraging kids to play in our city.”

The City should be putting basketball nets up not pulling them down. I’ve delivered that message to our parks staff tonight – they agree. We should absolutely be encouraging kids to play in our city. https://t.co/Sk1UQn5UVC

— John Tory (@JohnTory) June 27, 2019

The city released a statement the next morning discontinuing the practice, explaining that it had stemmed from an attempt “to balance the rights of everyone to enjoy Toronto’s parks – and play basketball – with the rights of residents adjacent to those parks when it comes to noise.”

Hoops had been removed only from parks close to homes, the city said, but it now recognized that taking them down at 6 p.m. “is not reasonable.”

Effective immediately, the city said it would suspend hoop removal “so residents can continue to enjoy a game of basketball into the evening.”

Below is our statement on the removal of basketball hoops in some parks. This practice has been suspended effective immediately. pic.twitter.com/pdt2zDWiNW

— City of Toronto (@cityoftoronto) June 27, 2019

The Toronto District School Board also announced that it would leave up its basketball nets outside school hours — though it said the move would be a “6-month pilot project to better understand any potential issues.”

Not everyone was impressed. “Where was this 20 years ago when I was in school,” one person tweeted. “Took them down every year in scarborough. All it took was an nba championship and social media. SMH.”

Robson, who posted the initial video of the rims being removed, posted a photo the next day that suggested the city was following through on its vow.

BREAKING: The rim is back up and looking majestic at Phin Park, according to my sources. Let’s hope it stays up past 6:00pm! @cityoftoronto #RimsUp pic.twitter.com/GdSBhHRSel

— Mitch Robson (@_mitchrobson) June 27, 2019

“The rim is back up and looking majestic at Phin Park, according to my sources,” he wrote. “Let’s hope it stays up past 6:00pm!”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)